ADHD Adults Meta-Analysis

Sensitivity and Specificity Meta-Analysis

<h2>self_report</h2><br>N Studies = 39 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 78; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 39)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.5983  0.7735     39     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.3843  1.1766     39     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    39 
spec   -0.3138         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 76) = 1025.2510, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 164.7769, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se     zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub      
outcomesens    1.4343  0.1416  10.1304  <.0001  1.1568  1.7118  *** 
outcomespec    0.9784  0.1974   4.9555  <.0001  0.5915  1.3654  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 29.33%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 67.87%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.No discrepant studies. <p><h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 78; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 39)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.5950  0.7714     39     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.2776  1.1303     39     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    39 
spec   -0.3743         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 74) = 988.4096, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 186.3912, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.3749  0.1864  7.3765  <.0001  1.0096 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.5094  0.2161  6.9851  <.0001  1.0859 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.6297  0.2453  2.5676  0.0102  0.1490 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.5006  0.3014  4.9792  <.0001  0.9099 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  1.7403  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   1.9330  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  1.1104    * 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   2.0913  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```


|                                  | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:---------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens |         0.798|    0.733|    0.851|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.819|    0.748|    0.874|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec |         0.652|    0.537|    0.752|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.818|    0.713|    0.890|
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.1345 0.2854 0.4713 0.6374   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.2221, p-val = 0.6374

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.8708 0.3886 2.2413 0.0250 * 

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 5.0232, p-val = 0.0250

```
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 39 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 78; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 39)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.5893  0.7677     39     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.4009  1.1836     39     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    39 
spec   -0.3019         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 74) = 1020.6790, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 164.9986, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    1.5232  0.1646  9.2543  <.0001  1.2006 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens     1.1900  0.2715  4.3835  <.0001  0.6579 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    0.8800  0.2358  3.7325  0.0002  0.4179 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec     1.2235  0.3682  3.3225  0.0009  0.5017 
                                   ci.ub      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  1.8458  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens   1.7221  *** 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  1.3421  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec   1.9452  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.821|    0.769|    0.864|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.767|    0.659|    0.848|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.707|    0.603|    0.793|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.773|    0.623|    0.875|
```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.3332 0.3175 -1.0497 0.2939   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 1.1018, p-val = 0.2939

```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.3435 0.4372 0.7856 0.4321   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.6171, p-val = 0.4321

```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 39 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.821|    0.769|    0.864|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.767|    0.659|    0.848|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.707|    0.603|    0.793|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.773|    0.623|    0.875|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 68; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 34)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.5316  0.7291     34     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.2446  1.1156     34     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    34 
spec   -0.4326         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 64) = 861.1957, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 162.7099, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.3651  0.1779  7.6728  <.0001  1.0164 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.5751  0.2515  6.2627  <.0001  1.0821 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.6300  0.2422  2.6007  0.0093  0.1552 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.0835  0.3545  3.0561  0.0022  0.3886 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  1.7138  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   2.0680  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  1.1048   ** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.7784   ** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.2100 0.3081 0.6816 0.4955   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.4645, p-val = 0.4955

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p><h2>peer_rating</h2><br>N Studies = 3 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 6; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 3)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    1.4117  1.1882      3     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2326  0.4823      3     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     3 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 4) = 16.1994, p-val = 0.0028

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 43.0709, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb   ci.ub     
outcomesens    1.4069  0.7286  1.9308  0.0535  -0.0213  2.8350   . 
outcomespec    0.9231  0.3472  2.6589  0.0078   0.2426  1.6035  ** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 79.33%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 13.07%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.No discrepant studies. <p><h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 6; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 3)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    1.3801  1.1748      3     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2764  0.5257      3     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     3 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 2) = 7.9550, p-val = 0.0187

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 45.6430, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.9781  0.9010  2.1954  0.0281   0.2121 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     0.3773  1.2043  0.3133  0.7541  -1.9831 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.7330  0.4381  1.6732  0.0943  -0.1256 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.2528  0.7005  1.7884  0.0737  -0.1202 
                                    ci.ub    
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  3.7440  * 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   2.7377    
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  1.5916  . 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   2.6257  . 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```


|                                  | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:---------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens |         0.878|    0.553|    0.977|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.593|    0.121|    0.939|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec |         0.675|    0.469|    0.831|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.778|    0.470|    0.932|
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -1.6008 1.5041 -1.0643 0.2872   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 1.1328, p-val = 0.2872

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.5198 0.8262 0.6291 0.5293   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.3958, p-val = 0.5293

```
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 3 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 6; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 3)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    1.3801  1.1748      3     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2764  0.5257      3     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     3 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 2) = 7.9550, p-val = 0.0187

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 45.6430, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    0.3773  1.2043  0.3133  0.7541  -1.9831 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens     1.9781  0.9010  2.1954  0.0281   0.2121 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    1.2528  0.7005  1.7884  0.0737  -0.1202 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec     0.7330  0.4381  1.6732  0.0943  -0.1256 
                                   ci.ub    
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  2.7377    
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens   3.7440  * 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  2.6257  . 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec   1.5916  . 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.593|    0.121|    0.939|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.878|    0.553|    0.977|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.778|    0.470|    0.932|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.675|    0.469|    0.831|
```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   1.6008 1.5041 1.0643 0.2872   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 1.1328, p-val = 0.2872

```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.5198 0.8262 -0.6291 0.5293   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.3958, p-val = 0.5293

```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 3 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.593|    0.121|    0.939|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.878|    0.553|    0.977|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.778|    0.470|    0.932|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.675|    0.469|    0.831|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 6; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 3)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    1.3801  1.1748      3     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2764  0.5257      3     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     3 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 2) = 7.9550, p-val = 0.0187

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 45.6430, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.9781  0.9010  2.1954  0.0281   0.2121 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     0.3773  1.2043  0.3133  0.7541  -1.9831 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.7330  0.4381  1.6732  0.0943  -0.1256 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.2528  0.7005  1.7884  0.0737  -0.1202 
                                    ci.ub    
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  3.7440  * 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   2.7377    
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  1.5916  . 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   2.6257  . 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -1.6008 1.5041 -1.0643 0.2872   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 1.1328, p-val = 0.2872

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p><h2>neuropsycho_tests</h2><br>N Studies = 22 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 44; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 22)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.5754  0.7586     22     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.3388  0.5820     22     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    22 
spec   -0.4975         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 42) = 198.3373, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 147.1508, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub      
outcomesens    1.1360  0.1837  6.1835  <.0001  0.7759  1.4960  *** 
outcomespec    1.0897  0.1490  7.3119  <.0001  0.7976  1.3818  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 56.97%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 33.54%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.

|ID                    | sensitivity_neuropsycho_tests| sens_calculated| specificity_neuropsycho_tests| spec_calculated| true_positive_neuropsycho_tests| false_positive_neuropsycho_tests| true_negative_neuropsycho_tests| false_negative_neuropsycho_tests| total_positive|
|:---------------------|-----------------------------:|---------------:|-----------------------------:|---------------:|-------------------------------:|--------------------------------:|-------------------------------:|--------------------------------:|--------------:|
|Schreiber, 1999{#818} |                            75|              83|                            81|              72|                              15|                                5|                              13|                                3|             16|
|Corbett, 1999{#15056} |                            81|              93|                            82|              60|                              25|                                6|                               9|                                2|             11|
<h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 44; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 22)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6212  0.7881     22     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2323  0.4820     22     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    22 
spec   -0.5903         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 40) = 176.7605, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 192.9916, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.0857  0.2903  3.7399  0.0002  0.5167 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.1946  0.2500  4.7789  <.0001  0.7046 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.7256  0.2047  3.5452  0.0004  0.3244 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.3329  0.1686  7.9074  <.0001  1.0025 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  1.6547  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   1.6845  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  1.1267  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.6633  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```


|                                  | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:---------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens |         0.748|    0.626|    0.840|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.768|    0.669|    0.844|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec |         0.674|    0.580|    0.755|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.791|    0.732|    0.841|
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.1088 0.3831 0.2841 0.7763   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.0807, p-val = 0.7763

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.6073 0.2651 2.2905 0.0220 * 

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 5.2466, p-val = 0.0220

```
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 22 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 44; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 22)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.4410  0.6641     22     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.3565  0.5971     22     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    22 
spec   -0.7183         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 40) = 176.8759, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 218.5024, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se     zval    pval    ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    1.1867  0.1690   7.0220  <.0001   0.8555 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens    -0.4480  0.7157  -0.6260  0.5313  -1.8508 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    1.0975  0.1554   7.0643  <.0001   0.7930 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec     0.7932  0.6580   1.2056  0.2280  -0.4964 
                                   ci.ub      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  1.5179  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens   0.9548      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  1.4020  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec   2.0828      

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.766|    0.702|    0.820|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.390|    0.136|    0.722|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.750|    0.688|    0.803|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.689|    0.378|    0.889|
```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -1.6347 0.7354 -2.2229 0.0262 * 

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 4.9412, p-val = 0.0262

```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.3043 0.6761 -0.4501 0.6526   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.2026, p-val = 0.6526

```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 22 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.766|    0.702|    0.820|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.390|    0.136|    0.722|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.750|    0.688|    0.803|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.689|    0.378|    0.889|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 38; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 19)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6015  0.7755     19     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.1420  0.3768     19     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    19 
spec   -0.5519         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 34) = 127.5632, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 184.4401, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.2375  0.3320  3.7276  0.0002  0.5868 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.3269  0.2599  5.1054  <.0001  0.8175 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.4600  0.1981  2.3228  0.0202  0.0719 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.3128  0.1517  8.6515  <.0001  1.0154 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  1.8881  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   1.8363  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  0.8482    * 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.6102  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.0894 0.4216 0.2121 0.8320   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.0450, p-val = 0.8320

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p><h2>neuroimaging</h2><br>N Studies = 12 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 24; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 12)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.8270  0.9094     12     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2196  0.4686     12     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    12 
spec    0.5684         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 22) = 121.6357, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 64.7901, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub      
outcomesens    1.4323  0.2923  4.8994  <.0001  0.8593  2.0053  *** 
outcomespec    1.3788  0.1752  7.8702  <.0001  1.0354  1.7222  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 72.35%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 19.21%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.

|ID                    | sensitivity_neuroimaging| sens_calculated| specificity_neuroimaging| spec_calculated| true_positive_neuroimaging| false_positive_neuroimaging| true_negative_neuroimaging| false_negative_neuroimaging| total_positive|
|:---------------------|------------------------:|---------------:|------------------------:|---------------:|--------------------------:|---------------------------:|--------------------------:|---------------------------:|--------------:|
|Kautzky, 2020{#14586} |                       65|              62|                       76|              77|                         10|                           5|                         17|                           6|             23|
<h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 24; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 12)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    1.0485  1.0240     12     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.5508  0.7421     12     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    12 
spec    0.7618         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 20) = 92.4254, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 39.3287, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.2386  0.7778  1.5923  0.1113  -0.2860 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.5259  0.3547  4.3019  <.0001   0.8307 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    2.0096  0.6165  3.2596  0.0011   0.8013 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.3830  0.2683  5.1545  <.0001   0.8571 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  2.7631      
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   2.2212  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  3.2180   ** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.9088  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```


|                                  | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:---------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens |         0.775|    0.429|    0.941|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.821|    0.697|    0.902|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec |         0.882|    0.690|    0.962|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.799|    0.702|    0.871|
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.2874 0.8549 0.3362 0.7368   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.1130, p-val = 0.7368

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.6266 0.6724 -0.9320 0.3513   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.8686, p-val = 0.3513

```
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 12 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 24; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 12)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    1.0457  1.0226     12     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.3618  0.6015     12     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    12 
spec    0.6317         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 20) = 118.8641, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 47.8778, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    1.4806  0.3391  4.3659  <.0001   0.8159 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens     1.3049  1.0607  1.2302  0.2186  -0.7740 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    1.4196  0.2205  6.4375  <.0001   0.9874 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec     1.4718  0.6705  2.1951  0.0282   0.1576 
                                   ci.ub      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  2.1453  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens   3.3839      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  1.8518  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec   2.7860    * 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.815|    0.693|    0.895|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.787|    0.316|    0.967|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.805|    0.729|    0.864|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.813|    0.539|    0.942|
```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.1757 1.1136 -0.1578 0.8746   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.0249, p-val = 0.8746

```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.0522 0.7058 0.0739 0.9411   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.0055, p-val = 0.9411

```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 12 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.815|    0.693|    0.895|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.787|    0.316|    0.967|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.805|    0.729|    0.864|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.813|    0.539|    0.942|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 24; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 12)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    1.0485  1.0240     12     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.5508  0.7421     12     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    12 
spec    0.7618         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 20) = 92.4254, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 39.3287, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.2386  0.7778  1.5923  0.1113  -0.2860 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.5259  0.3547  4.3019  <.0001   0.8307 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    2.0096  0.6165  3.2596  0.0011   0.8013 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.3830  0.2683  5.1545  <.0001   0.8571 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  2.7631      
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   2.2212  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  3.2180   ** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.9088  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.2874 0.8549 0.3362 0.7368   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.1130, p-val = 0.7368

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p><h2>clinician_interview</h2><br>N Studies = 5 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 10; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 5)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.9227  0.9606      5     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.3269  1.1519      5     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     5 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 8) = 182.4182, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 355.4641, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb   ci.ub      
outcomesens    2.1993  0.4601  4.7795  <.0001   1.2974  3.1011  *** 
outcomespec    1.0338  0.5355  1.9306  0.0535  -0.0157  2.0833    . 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 39.56%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 56.89%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.No discrepant studies. <p><h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 10; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 5)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.9593  0.9794      5     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.3354  1.1556      5     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     5 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 6) = 178.6452, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 361.8111, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    2.3766  0.5136  4.6274  <.0001   1.3700 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     2.1972  1.2308  1.7852  0.0742  -0.2151 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.7845  0.5896  1.3305  0.1833  -0.3711 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     2.9444  1.3644  2.1580  0.0309   0.2702 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  3.3832  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   4.6095    . 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  1.9401      
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   5.6187    * 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```


|                                  | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:---------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens |         0.915|    0.797|    0.967|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.900|    0.446|    0.990|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec |         0.687|    0.408|    0.874|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.950|    0.567|    0.996|
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.1793 1.3336 -0.1345 0.8930   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.0181, p-val = 0.8930

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   2.1599 1.4864 1.4531 0.1462   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 2.1116, p-val = 0.1462

```
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 5 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 10; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 5)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.4213  0.6491      5     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.3319  1.1541      5     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     5 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 6) = 28.7913, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 304.7048, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    2.6203  0.4087  6.4115  <.0001   1.8193 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens     1.0912  0.6716  1.6248  0.1042  -0.2251 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    0.7724  0.6118  1.2625  0.2068  -0.4267 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec     2.3087  1.1589  1.9921  0.0464   0.0372 
                                   ci.ub      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  3.4213  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens   2.4075      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  1.9716      
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec   4.5801    * 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.932|    0.860|    0.968|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.749|    0.444|    0.917|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.684|    0.395|    0.878|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.910|    0.509|    0.990|
```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -1.5291 0.7862 -1.9451 0.0518 . 

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 3.7833, p-val = 0.0518

```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   1.5363 1.3105 1.1723 0.2411   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 1.3742, p-val = 0.2411

```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 5 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.932|    0.860|    0.968|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.749|    0.444|    0.917|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.684|    0.395|    0.878|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.910|    0.509|    0.990|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 8; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 4)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.9593  0.9794      4     no   sens 
tau^2.2    1.3354  1.1556      4     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     4 
spec   -1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 6) = 178.6452, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 337.9243, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    2.3766  0.5136  4.6274  <.0001   1.3700 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    0.7845  0.5896  1.3305  0.1833  -0.3711 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  3.3832  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  1.9401      

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```
NA
```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p><h2>combination</h2><br>N Studies = 13 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 26; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 13)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6132  0.7830     13     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.1118  0.3344     13     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    13 
spec    0.2736         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 24) = 116.5486, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 127.6481, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se     zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub      
outcomesens    1.5008  0.2523   5.9489  <.0001  1.0063  1.9952  *** 
outcomespec    1.5146  0.1447  10.4699  <.0001  1.2311  1.7981  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 73.86%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 13.47%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.No discrepant studies. <p><h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 26; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 13)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6427  0.8017     13     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.1342  0.3664     13     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    13 
spec    0.2152         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 22) = 110.5529, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 119.8333, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.7649  0.4156  4.2465  <.0001  0.9503 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.3425  0.3272  4.1030  <.0001  0.7012 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    1.5595  0.2546  6.1243  <.0001  1.0604 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.4803  0.1896  7.8087  <.0001  1.1088 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  2.5795  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   1.9837  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  2.0586  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.8518  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```


|                                  | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:---------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens |         0.854|    0.721|    0.930|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.793|    0.668|    0.879|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec |         0.826|    0.743|    0.887|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.815|    0.752|    0.864|
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.4225 0.5290 -0.7987 0.4245   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.6379, p-val = 0.4245

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.0792 0.3175 -0.2494 0.8030   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.0622, p-val = 0.8030

```
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 13 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 26; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 13)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6184  0.7864     13     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.1329  0.3646     13     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    13 
spec    0.2639         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 22) = 109.8885, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 119.2274, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    1.4418  0.2627  5.4879  <.0001  0.9269 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens     2.2773  0.9456  2.4084  0.0160  0.4240 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    1.5156  0.1575  9.6232  <.0001  1.2069 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec     1.4881  0.5550  2.6811  0.0073  0.4003 
                                   ci.ub      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  1.9568  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens   4.1305    * 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  1.8243  *** 
has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec   2.5759   ** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.809|    0.716|    0.876|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.907|    0.604|    0.984|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.820|    0.770|    0.861|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.816|    0.599|    0.929|
```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval   
1:   0.8354 0.9814 0.8513 0.3946   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.7247, p-val = 0.3946

```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                           
1: -has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec + has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.0275 0.5769 -0.0477 0.9619   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.0023, p-val = 0.9619

```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 13 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.809|    0.716|    0.876|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.907|    0.604|    0.984|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.820|    0.770|    0.861|
|has_comorbidityTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.816|    0.599|    0.929|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 26; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 13)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6427  0.8017     13     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.1342  0.3664     13     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    13 
spec    0.2152         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 22) = 110.5529, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 119.8333, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.7649  0.4156  4.2465  <.0001  0.9503 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.3425  0.3272  4.1030  <.0001  0.7012 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec    1.5595  0.2546  6.1243  <.0001  1.0604 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.4803  0.1896  7.8087  <.0001  1.1088 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  2.5795  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   1.9837  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  2.0586  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.8518  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.4225 0.5290 -0.7987 0.4245   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 0.6379, p-val = 0.4245

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p><h2>biomarker</h2><br>N Studies = 9 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 18; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 9)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6201  0.7875      9     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.6811  0.8253      9     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     9 
spec   -0.3952         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 16) = 105.3041, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 36.4277, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub      
outcomesens    1.3361  0.3072  4.3487  <.0001  0.7339  1.9383  *** 
outcomespec    0.8084  0.3073  2.6309  0.0085  0.2062  1.4106   ** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 45.51%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 49.99%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.

|ID                    | sensitivity_biomarker| sens_calculated| specificity_biomarker| spec_calculated| true_positive_biomarker| false_positive_biomarker| true_negative_biomarker| false_negative_biomarker| total_positive|
|:---------------------|---------------------:|---------------:|---------------------:|---------------:|-----------------------:|------------------------:|-----------------------:|------------------------:|--------------:|
|Kautzky, 2020{#14586} |                    71|              69|                    80|              82|                      11|                        4|                      18|                        5|             23|
<h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 18; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 9)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.1466  0.3829      9     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2081  0.4561      9     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     9 
spec    0.9475         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 14) = 77.9649, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 54.8867, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se     zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    2.0115  0.5710   3.5226  0.0004   0.8923 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.0790  0.1782   6.0558  <.0001   0.7298 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec   -0.8141  0.5032  -1.6179  0.1057  -1.8004 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     0.9843  0.2047   4.8079  <.0001   0.5830 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  3.1307  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   1.4283  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  0.1721      
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.3855  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```


|                                  | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:---------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens |         0.882|    0.709|    0.958|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  |         0.746|    0.675|    0.807|
|neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec |         0.307|    0.142|    0.543|
|neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  |         0.728|    0.642|    0.800|
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.9325 0.5982 -1.5588 0.1190   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 2.4300, p-val = 0.1190

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs not<p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se   zval   pval     
1:   1.7984 0.5433 3.3104 0.0009 *** 

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 10.9588, p-val = 0.0009

```
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 9 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 18; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 9)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6201  0.7875      9     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.6811  0.8253      9     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     9 
spec   -0.3952         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 16) = 105.3041, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 36.4277, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    1.3361  0.3072  4.3487  <.0001  0.7339 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    0.8084  0.3073  2.6309  0.0085  0.2062 
                                   ci.ub      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  1.9383  *** 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  1.4106   ** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.792|    0.676|    0.874|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.692|    0.551|    0.804|
```
NA
```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```
NA
```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 9 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.792|    0.676|    0.874|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.692|    0.551|    0.804|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 16; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 8)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.1479  0.3845      8     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.2769  0.5262      8     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -     8 
spec    1.0000         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 12) = 71.7834, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:4):
QM(df = 4) = 44.6989, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                   estimate      se     zval    pval    ci.lb 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens    1.9854  0.5706   3.4796  0.0005   0.8671 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens     1.0230  0.1974   5.1836  <.0001   0.6362 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec   -0.7885  0.5461  -1.4440  0.1487  -1.8588 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec     1.1144  0.2535   4.3967  <.0001   0.6176 
                                    ci.ub      
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens  3.1037  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens   1.4098  *** 
neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomespec  0.2818      
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec   1.6112  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```

Hypothesis:                                                                             
1: -neurotypical_modFALSE:outcomesens + neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens = 0 

Results:
   estimate     se    zval   pval   
1:  -0.9624 0.6038 -1.5941 0.1109   

Test of Hypothesis:
QM(df = 1) = 2.5411, p-val = 0.1109

```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p><h2>EEG</h2><br>N Studies = 13 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 26; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 13)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.5297  0.7278     13     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.8992  0.9482     13     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    13 
spec    0.7678         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 24) = 160.3816, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 60.4037, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

             estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb   ci.ub      
outcomesens    1.8907  0.2480  7.6234  <.0001  1.4046  2.3768  *** 
outcomespec    1.7133  0.2991  5.7286  <.0001  1.1271  2.2994  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
**I-squared for Sensitivity:** 34.07%<p>**I-squared for Specificity:** 57.84%<p>

<h3>Discrepant Studies</h3><br>Discrepant studies are those where the value for 
        sensitivity and specificity that we calculate are > 1% different
        than the value that is in the paper.

|ID               | sensitivity_EEG| sens_calculated| specificity_EEG| spec_calculated| true_positive_EEG| false_positive_EEG| true_negative_EEG| false_negative_EEG| total_positive|
|:----------------|---------------:|---------------:|---------------:|---------------:|-----------------:|------------------:|-----------------:|------------------:|--------------:|
|Poil, 2014{#722} |              67|              64|              83|              84|                 7|                  4|                21|                  4|             25|
<h3>Neurotypical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled as Neurotypical 
        with all other studies.No variation in neurotypical - comparison not progressing.
<h3>Comorbiditises Only</h3><p>Compare co-NA studies with any other comborbidity. <p>N Studies = 13 <p>
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 26; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 13)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.5297  0.7278     13     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.8992  0.9482     13     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    13 
spec    0.7678         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 24) = 160.3816, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 60.4037, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens    1.8907  0.2480  7.6234  <.0001  1.4046 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec    1.7133  0.2991  5.7286  <.0001  1.1271 
                                   ci.ub      
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens  2.3768  *** 
has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec  2.2994  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for comorbidity vs not<p>

|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.869|    0.803|    0.915|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.847|    0.755|    0.909|
```
NA
```
Test of difference in specificity for comorbidity vs not<p>```
NA
```
<h3>Neurotypical Only vs Clinical Only</h3><p>This section compares those studies which were labelled Neurotypical 
        with those students that were labelled Clinical. If the study was not
        labelled with either, or was labelled with both, it is not included.N Studies = 13 <p>


|                                 | Estimate_Prob| Lower_CI| Upper_CI|
|:--------------------------------|-------------:|--------:|--------:|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomesens |         0.869|    0.803|    0.915|
|has_comorbidityFALSE:outcomespec |         0.847|    0.755|    0.909|
```

Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model (k = 24; method: REML)

Variance Components:

outer factor: study   (nlvls = 12)
inner factor: outcome (nlvls = 2)

            estim    sqrt  k.lvl  fixed  level 
tau^2.1    0.6038  0.7771     12     no   sens 
tau^2.2    0.9468  0.9730     12     no   spec 

      rho.sens  rho.spec    sens  spec 
sens         1                 -    12 
spec    0.7656         1      no     - 

Test for Residual Heterogeneity:
QE(df = 22) = 157.4633, p-val < .0001

Test of Moderators (coefficients 1:2):
QM(df = 2) = 50.7133, p-val < .0001

Model Results:

                                  estimate      se    zval    pval   ci.lb 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens    1.8917  0.2697  7.0140  <.0001  1.3631 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec    1.6625  0.3184  5.2206  <.0001  1.0383 
                                   ci.ub      
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomesens  2.4204  *** 
neurotypical_modTRUE:outcomespec  2.2866  *** 

---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

```
Test of difference in sensitivity for neurotypical vs clinical <p>```
NA
```
Test of difference in specificity for neurotypical vs clinical<p>